Pressure ulcers acquired during inpatient rehabilitation after spinal cord injury, characterization and predictors: A 15-years' experience.

BACKGROUND: Most studies focus on the risk factors associated with the development of pressure ulcers (PUs) during acute phase or community care for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to i) compare clinical and demographic characteristics of inpatients after SCI with PUs acquired during rehabilitation vs inpatients without PUs and ii) evaluate an existing PU risk assessment tool iii) identify first PU predictors. METHODS: Individuals (n = 1,135) admitted between 2008 and 2022 to a rehabilitation institution within 60 days after SCI were included. Admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) and mEntal state, Mobility, Incontinence, Nutrition, Activity (EMINA) were assessed. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were fitted. RESULTS: Overall incidence of PUs was 8.9%. Of these, 40.6% occurred in the first 30 days, 47.5% were sacral, 66.3% were Stage II. Patients with PUs were older, mostly with traumatic injuries (67.3%), AIS A (54.5%), lower FIM motor (mFIM) score and mechanical ventilation. We identified specific mFIM items to increase EMINA specificity. Adjusted Cox model yielded sex (male), age at injury, AIS grade, mFIM and diabetes as PUs predictors (C-Index = 0.749). CONCLUSION: Inpatients can benefit from combined assessments (EMINA + mFIM) and clinical features scarcely addressed in previous studies to prevent PUs.

Return to work within a year after first stroke: blue and white collar workers comparison, predictors and causal mediation assessed during inpatient rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Most research focuses around impairments in body function and structure, with relatively only a small number exploring their social impact. OBJECTIVES: 1) compare characteristics for individuals who before stroke were blue collar vs. white collar workers 2) identify clinical, functional, and job-related factors associated with return to work within 1 year after discharge 3) identify specific ADL individual items (assessed at rehabilitation discharge) as return to work predictors and 4) identify return to work causal mediators. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study, analyzing adult patients with stroke admitted to rehabilitation between 2007 and 2021, including baseline Barthel Index (BI) and return to work assessments between 2008 and 2022. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards were applied. Causal mediation analyses using 1000-bootstrapped simulations were performed. RESULTS: A total of 802 individuals were included (14.6% returned to work), 53.6% blue-collar and 46.4% white-collar. Blue-collar workers showed significantly higher proportion of ischemic stroke, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.Individuals not returning to work presented a higher proportion of blue collar, dominant side affected, aphasia, lower BI scores, and larger length of stay (LOS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards identified age at injury, aphasia, hypertension, and total discharge BI score (C-Index = 0.74). Univariable Cox models identified three independent BI items at all levels of independence: bathing (C-Index = 0.58), grooming (C-Index = 0.56) and feeding (C-Index = 0.59). BI efficiency (gain/LOS) was a causal mediator. CONCLUSION: Blue collar workers showed higher proportion of risk factors and comorbidities. Novel factors, predictors, and a return to work mediator were identified.

"Guttmann Cognitest®," a digital solution for assessing cognitive performance in adult population: A feasibility and usability pilot study.

Background: As the world population continues to age, the prevalence of neurological diseases, such as dementia, poses a significant challenge to society. Detecting cognitive impairment at an early stage is vital in preserving and enhancing cognitive function. Digital tools, particularly mHealth, offer a practical solution for large-scale population screening and prompt follow-up assessments of cognitive function, thus overcoming economic and time limitations. Objective: In this work, two versions of a digital solution called Guttmann Cognitest® were tested. Methods: Two hundred and one middle-aged adults used the first version (Group A), while 132 used the second one, which included improved tutorials and practice screens (Group B). This second version was also validated in an older age group (Group C). Results: This digital solution was found to be highly satisfactory in terms of usability and feasibility, with good acceptability among all three groups. Specifically for Group B, the system usability scale score obtained classifies the solution as the best imaginable in terms of usability. Conclusions: Guttmann Cognitest® has been shown to be effective and well-perceived, with a high potential for sustained engagement in tracking changes in cognitive function.

Effectiveness and efficiency of telerehabilitation on functionality after spinal cord injury: A matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation in spinal cord injury (teleSCI) is a growing field that can improve access to care and health outcomes in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The clinical effectiveness of teleSCI is not known. OBJECTIVES: To compare independence in activities of daily living and mobility capacity in patients following teleSCI and matched controls undergoing traditional rehabilitation. DESIGN: Matched case-control study. SETTING: TeleSCI occurring in home setting (cases) versus traditional rehabilitation on inpatient unit (controls). PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two consecutive patients with SCI followed with teleSCI were compared to 42 historical rehabilitation inpatients (controls) matched for age, time since injury to rehabilitation admission, level of injury (paraplegia/tetraplegia), complete or incomplete injury, and etiology (traumatic/nontraumatic). The teleSCI group (n = 42) was also compared to the complete cohort of historical controls (n = 613). INTERVENTIONS: The teleSCI group followed home-based telerehabilitation (3.5 h/day, 5 days/week, 67 days average duration) and historical controls followed in-person rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI). We formally compared gains, efficiency and effectiveness. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury and the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) were used. RESULTS: The teleSCI group (57.1% nontraumatic, 71.4% paraplegia, 73.8% incomplete, 52.4% AIS grade D) showed no significant differences compared with historical controls in AIS grades, neurological levels, duration, gains, efficiency and effectiveness in FIM, SCIM, or WISCI, although the teleSCI cohort had significantly higher admission FIM scores compared with the complete cohort of historical controls. CONCLUSIONS: TeleSCI may provide similar improvements in mobility and functional outcomes as traditional rehabilitation in medically stable patients (predominantly with paraplegia and motor incomplete SCI) when provided with appropriate support and equipment.

Tele-rehabilitation on independence in activities of daily living after stroke: A Matched Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare independence in activities of daily living (ADLs) in post-acute patients with stroke following tele-rehabilitation and matched in-person controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Matched case-control study. A total of 35 consecutive patients with stroke who followed tele-rehabilitation were compared to 35 historical in-person patients (controls) matched for age, functional independence at admission and time since injury to rehabilitation admission (<60 days). The tele-rehabilitation group was also compared to the complete cohort of historical controls (n=990). Independence in ADLs was assessed using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Barthel Index (BI). We formally compared FIM and BI gains calculated as discharge score - admission scores, efficiency measured as gains / length of stay and effectiveness defined as (discharge score-admission score)/ (maximum score-admission score). We analyzed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for FIM and BI. RESULTS: The groups showed no significant differences in type of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), location, severity, age at injury, length of stay, body mass index, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, aphasia, neglect, affected side of the body, dominance or educational level. The groups showed no significant differences in gains, efficiency nor effectiveness either using FIM or Barthel Index. We identified significant differences in two specific BI items (feeding and transfer) in favor of the in-person group. No differences were observed in the proportion of patients who achieved MCID. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were seen between total ADL scores for tele-rehabilitation and in-person rehabilitation. Future research studies should analyze a combined rehabilitation approach that utilizes both models.

Inpatient Rehabilitation Falls: Comparing Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Versus Patients With Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Cognitively impaired neurological rehabilitation inpatients are at an increased risk for falls; yet, little is known regarding fall risk of different groups, such as stroke versus traumatic brain injury. OBJECTIVES: To determine if rehabilitation patients' fall characteristics differ for patients with stroke versus patients with traumatic brain injury. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study evaluates inpatients with stroke or traumatic brain injury admitted to a rehabilitation center in Barcelona, Spain, between 2005 and 2021. We assessed independence in daily activities with the Functional Independence Measure. We compared fallen versus nonfallen patients' features and examined the association between time to first fall and risk using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 1,269 fall events were experienced by 898 different patients with traumatic brain injury ( n = 313; 34.9%) and stroke ( n = 585; 65.1%). A higher proportion of falls for patients with stroke occurred while performing rehabilitation activities (20.2%-9.8%), whereas falls were significantly higher for patients with traumatic brain injury during the night shift. Fall timing revealed completely different behaviors (stroke vs. traumatic brain injury), for example, an absolute peak at 6 a.m. due to young male traumatic patients. Nonfallen patients ( n = 1,363; 78.2%) were younger, with higher independence in daily activities scores, and having a larger time since injury to admission; all three were significant fall predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with traumatic brain injury and stroke showed different fall behaviors. Knowledge of fall patterns and characteristics in the inpatient rehabilitation setting can help design management protocols to mitigate their risk.

Predicting models for arm impairment: External validation of the Scandinavian models and identification of new predictors in post-acute stroke settings.

BACKGROUND: Post-stroke arm impairment at rehabilitation admission as predictor of discharge arm impairment was consistently reported as extremely useful. Several models for acute prediction exist (e.g. the Scandinavian), though lacking external validation and larger time-window admission assessments. OBJECTIVES: (1) use the 33 Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) individual items to predict total FMA-UE score at discharge of patients with ischemic stroke admitted to rehabilitation within 90 days post-injury, (2) use eight individual items (seven from the Scandinavian study plus the top predictor item from objective 1) to predict mild impairment (FMA-UE≥48) at discharge and (3) adjust the top three models from objective 2 with known confounders. METHODS: This was an observational study including 287 patients (from eight settings) admitted to rehabilitation (2009-2020). We applied regression models to candidate predictors, reporting adjusted R2, odds ratios and ROC-AUC using 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: We achieved good predictive power for the eight item-level models (AUC: 0.70-0.82) and for the three adjusted models (AUC: 0.85-0.88). We identified finger mass flexion as new item-level top predictor (AUC:0.88) and time to admission (OR = 0.9(0.9;1.0)) as only common significant confounder. CONCLUSION: Scandinavian item-level predictors are valid in a different context, finger mass flexion outperformed known predictors, days-to-admission predict discharge mild arm impairment.

Multicentric investigation on the safety, feasibility and usability of the ABLE lower-limb robotic exoskeleton for individuals with spinal cord injury: a framework towards the standardisation of clinical evaluations.

BACKGROUND: Robotic lower-limb exoskeletons have the potential to provide additional clinical benefits for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, high variability between protocols does not allow the comparison of study results on safety and feasibility between different exoskeletons. We therefore incorporated key aspects from previous studies into our study protocol and accordingly conducted a multicentre study investigating the safety, feasibility and usability of the ABLE Exoskeleton in clinical settings. METHODS: In this prospective pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study across two SCI centres in Germany and Spain, in- and outpatients with SCI were recruited into a 12-session training and assessment protocol, utilising the ABLE Exoskeleton. A follow-up visit after 4 weeks was included to assess after-training outcomes. Safety outcomes (device-related adverse events (AEs), number of drop-outs), feasibility and usability measures (level of assistance, donning/doffing-time) were recorded at every session together with changes in gait parameters and function. Patient-reported outcome measures including the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and the psychosocial impact of the device were performed. Satisfaction with the device was evaluated in both participants and therapists. RESULTS: All 24 participants (45 ± 12 years), with mainly subacute SCI (< 1 year after injury) from C5 to L3, (ASIA Impairment Scale A to D) completed the follow-up. In 242 training sessions, 8 device-related AEs (pain and skin lesions) were reported. Total time for don and doff was 6:50 ± 2:50 min. Improvements in level of assistance and gait parameters (time, steps, distance and speed, p < 0.05) were observed in all participants. Walking function and RPE improved in participants able to complete walking tests with (n = 9) and without (n = 6) the device at study start (p < 0.05). A positive psychosocial impact of the exoskeleton was reported and the satisfaction with the device was good, with best ratings in safety (participants), weight (therapists), durability and dimensions (both). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results prove the feasibility of safe gait training with the ABLE Exoskeleton in hospital settings for persons with SCI, with improved clinical outcomes after training. Our study protocol allowed for consistent comparison of the results with other exoskeleton trials and can serve as a future framework towards the standardisation of early clinical evaluations. Trial Registration https://trialsearch.who.int/ , DRKS00023503, retrospectively registered on November 18, 2020.

Long-term prediction of functional independence using adjusted and unadjusted single items of the functional independence measure (FIM) at discharge from rehabilitation.

CONTEXT: Being able to survive in the long-term independently is of concern to patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), their relatives, and to those providing or planning health care, especially at rehabilitation discharge. Most previous studies have attempted to predict functional dependency in activities of daily living within one year after injury. OBJECTIVES: (1) build 18 different predictive models, each model using one FIM (Functional Independence Measure) item, assessed at discharge, as independent predictor of total FIM score at chronic phase (3-6 years post-injury) (2) build three different predictive models, using in each model an item from a different FIM domain with the highest predictive power obtained in objective (1) to predict "good" functional independence at chronic phase and (3) adjust the 3 models from objective (2) with known confounding factors. METHODS: This observational study included 461 patients admitted to rehabilitation between 2009 and 2019. We applied regression models to predict total FIM score and "good" functional independence (FIM motor score ≥ 65) reporting adjusted R2, odds ratios, ROC-AUC (95% CI) tested using 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The top three predictors, each from a different FIM domain, were Toilet (adjusted R2 = 0.53, Transfers domain), Toileting (adjusted R2 = 0.46, Self-care domain), and Bowel (adjusted R2 = 0.35, Sphincter control domain). These three items were also predictors of "good" functional independence (AUC: 0.84-0.87) and their predictive power increased (AUC: 0.88-0.93) when adjusted by age, paraplegia, time since injury, and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge FIM items accurately predict long-term functional independence.

Long-term trajectories of community integration: identification, characterization, and prediction using inpatient rehabilitation variables.

BACKGROUND: Community integration (CI) is often regarded as the foundation of rehabilitation endeavors after stroke; nevertheless, few studies have investigated the relationship between inpatient rehabilitation (clinical and demographic) variables and long-term CI. OBJECTIVES: To identify novel classes of patients having similar temporal patterns in CI and relate them to baseline features. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study analyzing (n = 287) adult patients with stroke admitted to rehabilitation between 2003 and 2018, including baseline Functional Independence Measure (FIM) at discharge, follow-ups (m = 1264) of Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) between 2006 and 2022. Growth mixture models (GMMs) were fitted to identify CI trajectories, and baseline predictors were identified using multivariate logistic regression (reporting AUC) with 10-fold cross validation. RESULTS: Each patient was assessed at 2.7 (2.2-3.7), 4.4 (3.7-5.6), and 6.2 (5.4-7.4) years after injury, 66% had a fourth assessment at 7.9 (6.8-8.9) years. GMM identified three classes of trajectories.Lowest CI (n=105, 36.6%): The lowest mean total CIQ; highest proportion of dysphagia (47.6%) and aphasia (46.7%), oldest at injury, largest length of stay (LOS), largest time to admission, and lowest FIM.Highest CI (n=63, 21.9%): The highest mean total CIQ, youngest, shortest LOS, highest education (27% university) highest FIM, and Intermediate CI (n=119, 41.5%): Intermediate mean total CIQ and FIM scores. Age at injury OR: 0.89 (0.85-0.93), FIM OR: 1.04 (1.02-1.07), hypertension OR: 2.86 (1.25-6.87), LOS OR: 0.98 (0.97-0.99), and high education OR: 3.05 (1.22-7.65) predicted highest CI, and AUC was 0.84 (0.76-0.93). CONCLUSION: Novel clinical (e.g. hypertension) and demographic (e.g. education) variables characterized and predicted long-term CI trajectories.

Falls During Inpatient Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury: Characterization, Clock-Hour Visualization, and Time to Event Predictors.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) determine fall characteristics (eg, cause, location, witnesses) of inpatients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and whether they were different for ambulatory persons vs wheelchair users; (2) visualize the total number of daily falls per clock-hour for different inpatients' features (eg, cause of injury, age); (3) compare clinical and demographic characteristics of inpatients who experienced a first fall event vs inpatients who did not experience such event; and (4) identify first fall event predictors. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Institution for inpatient neurologic rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Persons with SCI (N=1294) admitted to a rehabilitation facility between 2005 and 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional independence measure (FIM), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) at admission. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used. RESULTS: A total of 502 fall events were experienced by 369 ambulatory inpatients (19.8%) and wheelchair users (80.2%) in 63.9% of cases being alone, with cause, situation, and location significantly different in both groups. Clock-hour visualizations revealed an absolute peak at 12 AM (complete or incomplete injuries, with paraplegia or tetraplegia) but a relative peak at 9 AM mainly including incomplete patients with paraplegia. Of the (n=1294) included patients, 16.8% experienced at least 1 fall. Fallen patients reported higher levels of HADS depression, lower total SCIM, and longer time since injury to admission, with no differences in age, sex, educational level, FIM (quasi-significant), and AIS grade. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards identified time since injury to admission and AIS grade D as significant predictors of first fall event. CONCLUSIONS: Falls identification, characterization, and clock-hour visualization can support decisions for mitigation strategies specifically addressed to inpatients with SCI. Fall predictors were identified as a first step for future research.

Developing an assistive technology usability questionnaire for people with neurological diseases.

PURPOSE: This study describes the development of a questionnaire for assessing the usability of assistive technologies accessible to people with neurological diseases. METHODS: A Delphi study was conducted to identify relevant items for the questionnaire. After that, the content validity was addressed to identify the essential items. Once the questionnaire was designed following the results of the Delphi study and content validity, the reliability, validity, and the Rasch model of the questionnaire were examined. RESULTS: Two rounds of the Delphi study were carried out. A total of 73 participants (42 experts and 31 users) participated in round 1, and 59 people (27 experts and 32 users) in round 2. A total of 53 and 29 items were identified in rounds 1 and 2, respectively. In the content validity, we found nine items above the threshold of 0.58. Finally, ten items were included in the questionnaire. Fifty-one participants participate in the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. The internal consistency reliability of the questionnaire analyzed by Cronbach's Alpha was α = 0,895. There was moderate to considerable concordance among our questionnaire items test-retest in the Kappa coefficient and a strong association between test-retest in the Spearman's coefficient ρ = 0.818 (p<0,001). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0,869 with a 95% confidence interval (0,781;0,923). There was a strong correlation between the total scores of the new questionnaire and other validated questionnaires analyzed with Spearman's coefficient ρ = 0.756 (p<0,001). The ten items demonstrated a satisfactory fit to the Rasch model. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggested that the new questionnaire is a reliable 10-item usability questionnaire that allows subjective and quick assessment of the usability of assistive technologies by people with neurological diseases.

Investigating the application of "Guttmann Cognitest"® in older adults and people with acquired brain injury.

Introduction: Digital solutions for cognitive assessment are currently not only widely used in experimental contexts but can also be useful in clinical practice for efficient screening and longitudinal follow-up. The "Guttmann Cognitest"®, which includes seven computerized tasks designed to assess main cognitive functions, revealed in a previous validation study to be a potential useful tool to assess cognitive functioning in healthy middle-aged adults. Method: Here, we present results from a validation in two different populations: one consisting of older adults, and the other comprising young and middle-aged individuals, some of them affected by acquired brain injury. To perform a convergent validity test, older adults were also administered with the MOCA, while young and middle-aged individuals were administered with a short neuropsychological assessment including gold-standard neuropsychological tests. We also conducted sensitivity and specificity analysis to establish the utility of this instrument in identifying potential cognitive dysfunctions in the two groups. Results: Results demonstrated strong convergent validity as well as good specificity and sensitivity characteristics. Discussion: This tool is a valid and useful instrument to assess cognitive functioning and detecting potential cases of cognitive dysfunctions in older adults and clinical populations.

"Guttmann Cognitest"®, preliminary validation of a digital solution to test cognitive performance.

Thanks to technological advances, the administration of cognitive assessments via digital solutions continues to increase, both in research and clinical practice. "Guttmann Cognitest"°ledR is a digital solution for cognitive assessment which includes seven computerized tasks designed to assess main cognitive functions requiring approximately 20 min to be completed. The purpose of the present study was to validate it against standard and more extensive in-person neuropsychological assessments in the context of the Barcelona Brain Health Initiative (BBHI) cohort study. We studied 274 participants of the BBHI (126 women, mean age = 56.14, age range 44-69), who underwent an extensive in-person assessment, including a classical paper-and-pencil neuropsychological assessment and a cognitive assessment via the "Guttmann Cognitest"°ledR. Principal component analysis indicated that "Guttmann Cognitest"°ledR measures four main cognitive domains and convergent validity analysis demonstrated that cognitive performance was associated with gold standard paper and pencil tests. Results also showed an expected negative correlation with age, a relation with educational level as well as a gender effect. Regression-based norming equations for the sample tested are also reported. Performing a cognitive assessment with this digital solution is feasible and potentially useful to gather information about cognitive functioning in large samples and experimental settings.

Clinical Prediction Rule Validation for Ambulation Outcome After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in a Spanish Population.

BACKGROUND: Predicting the ability to walk after traumatic spinal cord injury is of utmost importance in the clinical setting. Nevertheless, only a small fraction of predictive models are evaluated on their performance by other authors using external data. The Dutch Clinical Prediction Rule for long-term walking ability was developed and validated using neurological assessments performed within 15 days postinjury. However, in reality, this assessment is most often performed between 11 and 55 days. When considering a longer time from injury to neurological assessments, the Dutch Clinical Prediction Rule has only been externally validated for patients after non-traumatic spinal cord injury. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to validate the Dutch Clinical Prediction Rule with neurological assessment performed within 3-90 days after traumatic spinal cord injury, using (a) the Dutch Clinical Prediction Rule logistic regression coefficients (Equation 1); (b) the Dutch Clinical Prediction Rule weighted coefficients (Equation 2); and (c) the reestimated (using a Spanish population) weighted coefficients (Equation 3). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective (STROBE-compliant) study involving 298 adults with traumatic spinal cord injury admitted to a hospital between 2010 and 2019 in Spain. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure item-12 was used for walking assessment. RESULTS: Using Equation 1, the model yielded 86.2% overall classification accuracy, 94.5% sensitivity, and 83.4% specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.939, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.915-0.965; p < .001).Using Equation 2 yielded 86.2% overall classification accuracy, 93.2% sensitivity, and 83.9% specificity (AUC = 0.9392, 95% CI: 0.914-0.964; p < .001).Using Equation 3 yielded 86.9% overall classification accuracy, 68.9% sensitivity, and 92.8% specificity (AUC = 0.939, 95% CI: 0.914-0.964; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the Dutch Clinical Prediction Rule in a Spanish traumatic spinal cord injury population with assessments performed up to 90 days postinjury with similar performance, using the original coefficients and including a reestimation of the coefficients.

Long-term trajectories of motor functional independence after ischemic stroke in young adults: Identification and characterization using inpatient baseline assessments.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major worldwide cause of serious long-term disability. Most previous studies addressing functional independence included only inpatients with limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To identify novel classes of patients having similar temporal patterns in motor functional independence and relate them to baseline clinical features. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study, data were obtained for n = 428 adult patients with ischemic stroke admitted to rehabilitation (March 2005-March 2020), including baseline clinical features and follow-ups of motor Functional Independence Measure (mFIM) categorized as poor, fair or good. Growth mixture models (GMMs) were fitted to identify classes of patients with similar mFIM trajectories. RESULTS: GMM identified three classes of trajectories (1,664 mFIM assessments):C1 (11.2 %), 97.9% having poor admission mFIM, at 4.93 years 61.1% still poor, with the largest percentage of hypertension, neglect, dysphagia, diabetes and dyslipidemia of all three classes.C2 (23.1%), 99% had poor admission mFIM, 25% poor discharge mFIM, the largest percentage of aphasia and greatest mFIM gain, at 4.93 years only 6.2% still poor.C3 (65.7%) the youngest, lowest NIHSS, 37.7% poor admission mFIM, 73% good discharge mFIM, only 4.6% poor discharge mFIM, 90% good at 4.93 years. CONCLUSIONS: GMM identified novel motor functional classes characterized by baseline features.

The impact of COVID-19 on home, social, and productivity integration of people with chronic traumatic brain injury or stroke living in the community.

ABSTRACT: Compare community integration of people with stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI) living in the community before and during the coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 disease (COVID-19) when stratifying by injury: participants with stroke (G1) and with TBI (G2); by functional independence in activities of daily living: independent (G3) and dependent (G4); by age: participants younger than 54 (G5) and older than 54 (G6); and by gender: female (G7) and male (G8) participants.Prospective observational cohort studyIn-person follow-up visits (before COVID-19 outbreak) to a rehabilitation hospital in Spain and on-line during COVID-19.Community dwelling adults (≥18 years) with chronic stroke or TBI.Community integration questionnaire (CIQ) the total-CIQ as well as the subscale domains (ie, home-CIQ, social-CIQ, productivity CIQ) were compared before and during COVID-19 using the Wilcoxon ranked test or paired t test when appropriate reporting Cohen effect sizes (d). The functional independence measure was used to assess functional independence in activities of daily living.Two hundred four participants, 51.4% with stroke and 48.6% with TBI assessed on-line between June 2020 and April 2021 were compared to their own in-person assessments performed before COVID-19.When analyzing total-CIQ, G1 (d = -0.231), G2 (d = -0.240), G3 (d = -0.285), G5 (d = -0.276), G6 (d = -0.199), G7 (d = -0.245), and G8 (d = -0.210) significantly decreased their scores during COVID-19, meanwhile G4 was the only group with no significant differences before and during COVID-19.In productivity-CIQ, G1 (d = -0.197), G4 (d = -0.215), G6 (d = -0.300), and G8 (d = -0.210) significantly increased their scores, meanwhile no significant differences were observed in G2, G3, G5, and G7.In social-CIQ, all groups significantly decreased their scores: G1 (d = -0.348), G2 (d = -0.372), G3 (d = -0.437), G4 (d = -0.253), G5 (d = -0.394), G6 (d = -0.319), G7 (d = -0.355), and G8 (d = -0.365).In home-CIQ only G6 (d = -0.229) significantly decreased, no significant differences were observed in any of the other groups.The largest effect sizes were observed in total-CIQ for G3, in productivity-CIQ for G6, in social-CIQ for G3 and in home-CIQ for G6 (medium effect sizes).Stratifying participants by injury, functionality, age or gender allowed identifying specific CIQ subtotals where remote support may be provided addressing them.

The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on emotional and behavioral stress of informal family caregivers of individuals with stroke or traumatic brain injury at chronic phase living in a Mediterranean setting.

INTRODUCTION: Even in nonpandemic times, persons with disabilities experience emotional and behavioral disturbances which are distressing for them and for their close persons. We aimed at comparing the levels of stress in emotional and behavioral aspects, before and during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as reported by informal family caregivers of individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI) or stroke living in the community, considering two different stratifications of the recipients of care (cause and injury severity). METHODS: We conducted a STROBE-compliant prospective observational study analyzing informal caregivers of individuals with stroke (IC-STROKE) or traumatic brain injury (IC-TBI). IC-STROKE and IC-TBI were assessed in-person before and during COVID-19 online, using the Head Injury Behavior Scale (HIBS). The HIBS comprises behavioral and emotional subtotals (10 items each) and a total-HIBS. Comparisons were performed using the McNemar's test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test or t-test. Recipients of care were stratified according to their injury severity using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two informal caregivers (62.3% IC-STROKE and 37.7% IC-TBI) were assessed online between June 2020 and April 2021 and compared to their own assessments performed in-person 1.74 ± 0.88 years before the COVID-19 lockdown. IC-STROKE significantly increased their level of stress during COVID-19 in five emotional items (impatience, frequent complaining, often disputes topics, mood change and overly sensitive) and in one behavioral item (overly dependent). IC-TBI stress level only increased in one behavioral item (impulsivity). By injury severity, (i) mild (14.7%) showed no significant differences in emotional and behavioral either total-HIBS (ii) moderate (28.7%) showed significant emotional differences in two items (frequent complaining and mood change) and (iii) severe (56.6%) showed significant differences in emotional (often disputes topics) and behavioral (impulsivity) items. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest specific items in which informal caregivers could be supported considering cause or severity of the recipients of care.

The impact of COVID-19 on community integration, quality of life, depression and anxiety in people with chronic spinal cord injury.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: Compare community integration, quality of life, anxiety and depression of people with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) living in the community before the outbreak of coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) and during it. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: In-person follow-up visits (before COVID-19 outbreak) to a rehabilitation hospital in Spain and on-line during COVID-19. PARTICIPANTS: Community dwelling adults (≥ 18 years) with chronic SCI. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) and World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) were compared using the Wilcoxon ranked test or paired t-test when appropriate. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy five people with SCI assessed on-line between June 2020 and November 2020 were compared to their own assessments before COVID-19. Participants reported significantly decreased Social Integration during COVID-19 compared to pre-pandemic scores (P = 0.037), with a small effect size (d = -0.15). Depression (measured using HADS) was significantly higher than before COVID-19 (P < 0.001) with a moderate effect size (d = -0.29). No significant differences were found in any of the 4 WHOQOL-BREF dimensions (Physical, Psychological, Social and Environmental).Nevertheless, when all participants were stratified in two groups according to their age at on-line assessment, the younger group (19-54 years, N = 85) scored lower during COVID-19 than before, in WHOQOL-BREF Physical (P = 0.004), (d = -0.30) and Psychological dimensions (P = 0.007) (d = -0.29). The older group (55-88 years, N = 0) reported no significant differences in any dimension. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 impacted HADS' depression and CIQ's social integration. Participants younger than 55 years were impacted in WHOQOL-BREF's physical and psychological dimensions, meanwhile participants older than 55, were not.

Toward Personalized Web-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation for Patients With Ischemic Stroke: Elo Rating Approach.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a worldwide cause of disability; 40% of stroke survivors sustain cognitive impairments, most of them following inpatient rehabilitation at specialized clinical centers. Web-based cognitive rehabilitation tasks are extensively used in clinical settings. The impact of task execution depends on the ratio between the skills of the treated patient and the challenges imposed by the task itself. Thus, treatment personalization requires a trade-off between patients' skills and task difficulties, which is still an open issue. In this study, we propose Elo ratings to support clinicians in tasks assignations and representing patients' skills to optimize rehabilitation outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to stratify patients with ischemic stroke at an early stage of rehabilitation into three levels according to their Elo rating; to show the relationships between the Elo rating levels, task difficulty levels, and rehabilitation outcomes; and to determine if the Elo rating obtained at early stages of rehabilitation is a significant predictor of rehabilitation outcomes. METHODS: The PlayerRatings R library was used to obtain the Elo rating for each patient. Working memory was assessed using the DIGITS subtest of the Barcelona test, and the Rey Auditory Verbal Memory Test (RAVLT) was used to assess verbal memory. Three subtests of RAVLT were used: RAVLT learning (RAVLT075), free-recall memory (RAVLT015), and recognition (RAVLT015R). Memory predictors were identified using forward stepwise selection to add covariates to the models, which were evaluated by assessing discrimination using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for logistic regressions and adjusted R2 for linear regressions. RESULTS: Three Elo levels (low, middle, and high) with the same number of patients (n=96) in each Elo group were obtained using the 50 initial task executions (from a total of 38,177) for N=288 adult patients consecutively admitted for inpatient rehabilitation in a clinical setting. The mid-Elo level showed the highest proportions of patients that improved in all four memory items: 56% (54/96) of them improved in DIGITS, 67% (64/96) in RAVLT075, 58% (56/96) in RAVLT015, and 53% (51/96) in RAVLT015R (P<.001). The proportions of patients from the mid-Elo level that performed tasks at difficulty levels 1, 2, and 3 were 32.1% (3997/12,449), 31.% (3997/12,449), and 36.9% (4595/12,449), respectively (P<.001), showing the highest match between skills (represented by Elo level) and task difficulties, considering the set of 38,177 task executions. Elo ratings were significant predictors in three of the four models and quasi-significant in the fourth. When predicting RAVLT075 and DIGITS at discharge, we obtained R2=0.54 and 0.43, respectively; meanwhile, we obtained AUC=0.73 (95% CI 0.64-0.82) and AUC=0.81 (95% CI 0.72-0.89) in RAVLT075 and DIGITS improvement predictions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Elo ratings can support clinicians in early rehabilitation stages in identifying cognitive profiles to be used for assigning task difficulty levels.